$100 USD Paintings Currently Available (FaceBook album)
Advertisements
Jean Smith
P A I N T I N G S
Series
First there was “The Hat” (January 2016) and then, three months later, I tempted fate with “No Hat” wondering if there would be shock waves and public outcry. There was not! Whatever it is that propels this sweet spot of sales (a size+price+quality equation) is able to withstand detours into themed series within the 11 x 14″ series of contemporary portrait paintings.
When I do a painting that is a departure from my typical subject, I’m not really thinking about whether it will be a series or not. Surprisingly, reaction doesn’t play much of a role in whether I want to paint the same subject again. In fact, sometimes when a painting gets a lot of reaction when I post it on FaceBook, I don’t want to do another one like it. There’s something about having a unique, stand alone painting that’s very appealing. Also, after 30+ years as the singer and lyricist in a band that didn’t set out to be universally liked, I find it easy enough not to do what people seem to want me to do.
Most of the series seem to finish up around 10 or so, but “Ruff Collar” is currently up to 18 and “Sunday Morning” is at 4. I have no idea whether I’ll add to either at any point.
I know people want more astronauts (“Affirmative”), but unless I feel like painting astronauts there won’t be any!
“Pioneers of Aviation”
“Hoodie”
“Scuba”
“Landscape”
“Animals Available” (baboons, foxes, wolves)
“Ruff Collar”
“Headphones”
“Sunday Morning”
“Braces & Halter Top”
“Affirmative” (astronauts)
“Orange Jacket” (below)
Orange Jacket #1 SOLD
Orange Jacket #2 SOLD
Orange Jacket #3 SOLD
Orange Jacket #4 SOLD
Orange Jacket #5 SOLD
Orange Jacket #6 SOLD
Orange Jacket #7 SOLD
Orange Jacket #8
Orange Jacket #9
Orange Jacket #10
Business Opportunity
Galleries: 60 paintings for $6000
When buying a painting, re-sale potential is more than implied. It’s not like buying a fish supper or a Honda Civic. With art, there’s a fairly good chance you can, at some point, get your money back — or even make a profit.
I figure my ‘customers’ are buying paintings because they like them, but y’all are no dummies. There is an investment factor that is perhaps regarded as too gauche to parler. You know, the whole deceased artist leap in value thing which I am not working very well at all, because I keep mentioning that my parents are extremely old and in a roughly henceforth manner I guess I may live to be terrifyingly old, although the more I see of how it ends up, I think not. Thanks anyway.
I mentioned the idea of my paintings being priced for re-sale to my dad while I was doing my taxes and he said, “All paintings are for re-sale. That’s the name of the game.”
I am utterly thrilled to be able to make a living painting. This is one of the best times of my life! I am extremely grateful for all the support and enthusiasm. I don’t want to mess anything up. For the first year I was practically holding my breath, painting with fingers crossed, afraid that it would fizzle. It hasn’t! It’s growing! I may have to get used to being something of a success! Weird!
As I’ve said before, any money I make above expenses goes towards buying a property for the Free Artist Residency (on an island on the coast of British Columbia) where musicians, writers, filmmakers and visual artists can stay for free while working on projects.
I got to thinking more about galleries and representation after a few people misunderstood my post and thought I’d made the leap to the big time. Um, no. I’m not actively looking for a gallery; I would however work with one that felt inclined to include my story ($100 paintings online) rather than require I cease to function. I believe there is room for both. People get that there is an overhead factor to showing in a gallery. Staff, venue expenses etc. It’s all a matter of choosing a price that works without anyone feeling like they paid too much if they found paintings for less online.
At three for $1000 ($333 each), seeing them in person, on a wall, where they can be moved around is not going to drive anyone to find me on the internet to buy them at $100. I consider this reasonable mark up for curated art exhibit in a physical space.
Profit: $8000
Exhibition idea: leaning on narrow shelves so people can move them around to make groupings
Video: The Making of “No Hat #407”
How to paint videos on YouTube are typically about making a final product in a linear fashion, whereas I’m inside the painting process in a way that requires evaluating the whole and it is affected by each change I make. It’s about the relationship of parts and how they jive in terms of emotional intensities.
Music by Mecca Normal
The Making of “No Hat #407”
“No Hat #407″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD
Whenever I see ‘how to paint’ videos on YouTube I’m struck by conventional methods that seem based in entirely different philosophies than mine. These videos appear to be making a final product in a linear fashion, whereas I’m inside the painting process in a way that requires evaluating the whole and it is affected by each change I make. It’s about the relationship of parts and how they jive in terms of emotional intensities.
Some of the how to videos demonstrate painting various areas by colour or starting in one place and creeping out from there. Things I don’t do.
I was very happy with this painting in the first image (1.) Uncharacteristically, I considered leaving it there, which is why I took the photo. I proceeded because I was curious how it might evolve — which turned out be quite a lot more typical of how I work. It’s a matter of concentrating on a feature and then matching intensities of expression — mainly the eyes and mouth.
I’ll be comparing painting and singing on my art blog soon. How writing, performing and recording songs replicate various phases of the painting process.
Series
First there was “The Hat” (January 2016) and then, three months later, I tempted fate with “No Hat” wondering if there would be shock waves and public outcry. There was not! Whatever it is that propels this sweet spot of sales (a size+price+quality equation) is able to withstand detours into themed series within the 11 x 14″ series of contemporary portrait paintings.
When I do a painting that is a departure from my typical subject, I’m not really thinking about whether it will be a series or not. Surprisingly, reaction doesn’t play much of a role in whether I want to paint the same subject again. In fact, sometimes when a painting gets a lot of reaction when I post it on FaceBook, I don’t want to do another one like it. There’s something about having a unique, stand alone painting that’s very appealing. Also, after 30+ years as the singer and lyricist in a band that didn’t set out to be universally liked, I find it easy enough not to do what people seem to want me to do.
Most of the series seem to finish up around 10 or so, but “Ruff Collar” is currently up to 18 and “Sunday Morning” is at 4. I have no idea whether I’ll add to either at any point.
I know people want more astronauts (“Affirmative”), but unless I feel like painting astronauts there won’t be any!
“Pioneers of Aviation”
“Hoodie”
“Scuba”
“Landscape”
“Animals Available” (baboons, foxes, wolves)
“Ruff Collar”
“Headphones”
“Sunday Morning”
“Braces & Halter Top”
“Affirmative” (astronauts)
“Orange Jacket” (below)
“Bathing Cap”
Orange Jacket #1 SOLD
Orange Jacket #2 SOLD
Orange Jacket #3 SOLD
Orange Jacket #4 SOLD
Orange Jacket #5 SOLD
Orange Jacket #6 SOLD
Orange Jacket #7 SOLD
Orange Jacket #8
Orange Jacket #9
Orange Jacket #10
Video: Currently Available
Jean Smith’s $100 USD paintings (11 x 14″ acrylic on canvas panel) from May 15, 2018 back to the beginning of the series (January, 2016).
“First, oh my word I love these portraits {acrylic on canvas panel} so, so, so much. Second, Canadian rocker turned painter Jean Smith sells these paintings on Facebook for $100 a pop. WHAT? Yes, true story. Are you wondering what you’re still doing here and why you’re not over there buying a whole bunch of these 11×14 beauties? Me too. Here you go… Jean’s Facebook page. You’re welcome.” – The Jealous Curator
$100 USD paintings currently available
Email me if you see one you want to buy.
meccanormal@hotmail.com
Music by Mecca Normal
Dry Brush Technique
I was recently asked to write about dry brush technique for a book to be published in the UK. Some of this piece may be published with one of these two paintings.
“Nurse #4″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD
“Nurse #5″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) $100 USD plus shipping
I paint on canvas panels and use dry brush to give contour to areas on the face where gradation from light to dark will give a sense of depth. So, on the side of the face (along the hair and jaw line) the outside of the brush intends to create a more solid line while the paint of the inside of the brush – where I need the contour – intends to sit on the protruding weave of the canvas. To achieve this, I use more pressure on the dark side of the brush which may be a chiselled wedge or a ‘distressed’ flat brush between ½ and 1 inch. Where the brush doesn’t get into the depth of the canvas remains a lighter colour and in this way, the overall affect replicates a shading technique that, in drawing for instance, might be accomplished by crosshatching or smudging to make gradations of lightness.
If I’m not successful in getting the variation of lightness I want with the dark paint, I might go back in with the light colour of the face, and come at it from the other side. For me, dry brush is achieved in a variety of ways. Sometimes the brush itself has not gone into water prior to loading it with paint, or paint on a brush already in play is removed by dragging it across a clean surface – a plate or a cloth – so I can get a sense of how much paint will come off on the canvas. I use the latter mostly for delicate areas like the curve of the eyeball. Other times, a brush I’m actually working with on the surface of the painting may run out of paint, and I decide to continue pushing it around, knowing its predisposition in the moment. I utilize the canvas surface, the weft and the warp of the fabric, to replicate the fabric of clothing, in this case her cap and uniform. The most pronounced dry brush work here is the decorative detail around the cap (the black line) which intends to give it contour, allowing the dry brush to be at its weakest point where the most light hits the cap, where it bends. I did this near the end of the painting, once I’d established how much light was going to be on the face. I frequently use a dry brush on clothing because the weave of the canvas creates a degree of believability replicating the fabric of clothes. I tend to use dry brush here to introduce a different amount of realism (greater or lesser) than I’ve achieved in the face in terms of light or focus. In these cases I create conflicting information in the brain, asking the viewer to choose which reality it believes. It’s like how complementary colours vibrate. I find two degrees or more of realism instigate a mental struggle that wants to settle on the dominant realism. I don’t like to get too clever with this in the way that a lot of contemporary painting combines abstraction and realism as part of an illusion. Or maybe I’m well beyond trickery, because I don’t want the viewer to consciously notice this is what I’m doing; creating conflicting degrees of realism to heighten engagement with the viewer.
When I’m using dry brush to deal with the intensity of realism, I watch carefully what very small amounts of paint do to the overall affect in terms of bringing it into a particular plane of realism. This requires a kind of looking where I take in the whole of the painting while adding very subtle definition as opposed to believing certain areas should be a specific colour or darkness. I think about the pattern the paint on the canvas in terms of pixels, recognizing that because my work is exhibited online, the dry brush effect may translate as pixels or screened dots in traditional printing. Many times after adding dry brush I find I need to adjust the intensity of the main features on the faces – the nostrils, the highlight in the iris and the line between the lips, especially.
A trick I learned from an episode of that famous forger’s reality TV show was something John Singer Sargent did regularly. He used a more solid line on one side of the subject and a softer line on the other. I usually go for the harder line on the right fortified with a slightly more intense colour, which is sometimes a darker colour than the left, and I might choose to use a dry brush to make the left side softer.
